My search is over (really NSFW):
I would douche my ass out for Alexyss.
Pages
-
Recent Comments
HUNGRY HUNGRY HIPPOS on Merry Christmas! joel on Patterns gunslingergregi on Patterns gunslingergregi on Black Men, White Women gunslingergregi on Black Men, White Women You Know I'm Right on Patterns Instigator on Black Men, White Women GayButtox on Black Men, White Women The_King on Merry Christmas! Firepower on Black Men, White Women -
Top Posts
-
Recent Posts
c
Archives
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
Uncategorized
-
Twitter Updates
- let the NYTimes be bought by the gov't. it can't be any less objective than it already is. lay those cards on table, pinch. 3 months ago
- if you see a choper circling overhead with spotlight shining, that's your cue to move quickly to a chopperless area. 3 months ago
- betta fish update: still alive. 3 months ago
- spotted a black bear while hiking sugarloaf in md. gentle giant myass. i picked up my pace. 3 months ago
- all my sex dreams end just before completion. robbed! 3 months ago
Meta
Nice post. I can tell you are a real quality guy.
[...] Courtesy of Roissy. [...]
Truly what is wrong with the world…
and on a side note, i wash my damn nuts
Is she shaved?
http://men.style.com/details/features/full?id=content_5748
Given what a manatee her momma is, I commend her on staying so thin into her 40s.
But the day is nigh, Ms. Alexyss needs a bitta the penis powwa before she hits the wall.
Ha, I’ve been a fan of Alexyss Tyler for a while. You guys need to search Youtube for some of her other clips, especially the public access show she does with her mom. It’s surreal.
J, that article was pretty interesting. 55% of married women cheat and almost none of them feel any guilt about it. 90% felt entitled to the extramarital affair.
Usually Lurking, if you found that article interesting you should check out Roger Devlin’s article reviewing a book called Women’s Infidelity by Michelle Langley, or better yet the actual book Women’s Infidelity itself. I believe Roissy linked to Devlin’s articles somewhat recently. The book Women’s Infidelity can be downloaded as an ebook for a fee at http://womensinfidelity.com/
The GQ article is just the tip of the iceberg, Devlin and Langley blow it right open.
She makes me want to take a sledgehammer to all human sexuality.
/i>
Or you could just pick up a copy of Madame Bovary…
Kick a Bitch 8-
Yeah, her penis power youtube is amazing. Erotic as all hell, while pretending to be cautionary self help commentary for women.
It’s been going around.
Usually Lurking 9–
“J, that article was pretty interesting. 55% of married women cheat and almost none of them feel any guilt about it. 90% felt entitled to the extramarital affair.”
There is well established social research showing that in response to anonymous surveys asking about number of lifetime or other sex partners, women substantially under report, and men substantially over report. It’s not hard to understand why. In each case, it enhances their mating / sexual market reputations to do so (and for good evo-pysch as opposed to “surviving patriarchy” reasons). I think there is strong reason to think that the same applies more or less, or carries over to anonymous surveys reporting marital infidelity.
So I strongly suspect that young women are now cheating in MORE than 55% of marriages and probably a lot more and men are cheating in less than 60% of the time. There is probably usually something to the times a man claimed he cheated, but it might have been only with a prostitute (which hardly constitutes a marital threat (leaving aside very very unusual cases) unless the wife makes it so, as they do only in the feminist anglosphere and nowhere else.
Further in the vast majority of cases male cheating will not cause him to leave his marriage, and may VERY well invigorate his sexual interest in his wife. She’s the one likely to make it marriage destroying if she finds out. Men do leave their wives for younger women they fall truly in love with but this is the small minority case, not the majority danger it’s been made out to be by feminists for I don’t know, a hundred years. (Male infidelity is horrible – end the double standard (and adjusting divorce law accordingly) was one of the first feminist causes after getting the vote.
In contrast, female adultery, if it’s successful and she finds what she’s looking for, is very likely to be marriage shattering. Even if the marriage survives, it’s likely her romantic / sexual feelings for her husband will never be the same again – if she’s truly fallen in love with an adulterous lover. Most likely it won’t survive if she can get that lover to marry her, and even if not because she’ll probably get a divorce anyway to “grow” — find a new love of her life.
Regardless of how one feels about this current evolution under our current legal structures greatly protecting women versus men, one thing is manifestly and even obscenely unfair.
In most states these days (and really the question in all states is only one of degree, it’s always terrible) the husband STILL suffers the full freight divorce theft that was designed to address the husband trading in his aging wife with far fewer job market opportunities for a younger and prettier model.
It’s manifestly unfair and the law must change.
Until then men should wage a marriage strike. I have since my no kids divorce many years ago now, which pried open my eyes to this and caused to to research how much worse even it could have been. Lived happily with 4 diff women since, with lots of other action in between.
dougjnn 14–
Re: the effects of female infidelity on the WOMAN’s continuing full spectrum attachment to her husband, see Michelle Langley’s “Female Infidelity”. The estimable T of the Rawness gives a link at comment 10.
Uh never happened to me. But it makes me think of guys I see, some even with girlfriends, with visible globs of ear crust. You can’t hardly make out with someone without earplay getting involved so how does one go about having an entire relationship without earplay and the requisite grooming? There’s woefully uninspired sex going on.
Nigga please.
dougjnn,
In the newspaper today I saw an ad for a “workshop” for “divorcing” women. An attorney was conducting it.
All this was is one son-of-a-bitch lawyer looking to drum up business. It was held in Brentwood, a very wealthy area of the MSA of our city. Women who dont work, seeing the ad in the style section of the paper—-wondering just how much they could make off with of his hard-earned money. It makes me sick.
You mentioned …..”….full freight divorce theft that was designed to address the husband trading in his aging wife with far fewer job market opportunities for a younger and prettier model”
Thats so true. It infuriates me to see what has financially befallen several of my pals. Off the top of my head I can think of a “M’, an “S’, a “M”, a “R”, a “J”, a “P”, a “B”……….all who have had to pay out BIG TIME for a woman who was cheating ON THEM. One “M” had it happen to him TWICE for christsakkes. Our laws emasculate otherwise masculine, healthy men because of the financial consequences. All of these guys are manly men, the majority of them were high school sports stars. Seeing them beg to hold onto their marriage for the kids and the money to some cunt was sickening. If the laws were different, each and every one would have said ‘ “fuck off you fuckhole” to their ex-wives……….
We have got to even that playing field again with legal reform.
Who’s Alpha and Who’s beta in this vid?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dndpydJluXc
Heh Heh HEH!!!
Z –
We have got to even that playing field again with legal reform.
You said it brother!.
Z –
In the meantime Z men should wave a marriage strike. Seriously. Not necessarily a love and commitment strike, though we shouldn’t be fast and never first on those things either.
Living together should be a pre-req before marriage can even be considered. A good long test drive.
Then marriage if it’s to come, should only do so with children in mind. Then a prenup becomes essential.
In this day and age when women have similar career opportunities to men even though they often prefer that men act as their money focused mule team while they are more the landed gentry women, working status and fun jobs while they are those things, and even though women on their own bad and bearing their own responsibilities often wish to marry up to income levels they can’t manage themselves, should not be financially carried by an ex husband they decide they no longer wish to previde full and faithful marital services to.
Pre-nups should in the first instance be designed to re-create the financial effects upon any divorce, of only having lived together without marriage. Marital property split proportionately with income contribution, with the “name” in which property is held being of prime importance when that’s clear. Child support paid to the ex wife should be entirely dispensed with and 50/50 joint custody instititued instead. If one partner, usually the deserting former wife, has a lot less money to contribute tough. Maybe she should have stayed in her “forever” marriage.
Men have GOT to stop leaning over backwards to be more than fair to women. We’ve been doing it for 40 years and more, they’ve collectively and legally and when splitting shown no signs of ever returning the fairness favor despite all their propaganda to the contrary. Instead men have quite literally been progressively increasingly emasculated.
The fact that some alpha men remain on top and remain utterly un-emasculated does not change the over all picture, or the legal ass f*cking that men have collectively allowed to happen because they 1) didn’t want to think about women that way; 2) didn’t want to think about it period; 3) thought it would never happen to them because SHE loves me; 4) thought she was different.
Very few women are so different that they won’t let the system go for all it can, or almost, when and if she ever sets the divorce wheels in motion.
To summarize. 1) wage a marriage strike until the laws very, very substantially change. This means extreme reluctance, and once the relationship has gone on long and well, explaining why the reluctance. Read up. It’s better to live together indefinitely.
2) If you ever do after a long period of great resistance for excellent reasons (marriage has quite literally become an entirely one way legal institution in America) you do start considering marriage, only do so with a pre-nup as a precondition. The pre-nup should mimic the financial consequences on breakup of only living together in non palimony states. Child custody and child support is an especial challenge and requires special consideration. True joint custody with no one custodial parent and no support payments to that parent instead of directly for the child is the place to start.
to #21, Dougjnn,
when a young couple marries, one or both may make professional or job sacrifices/relocation/decline relocation for the union. When a child is born, one or both of the couple may make much bigger professional sacrifices. Often one of the spouses may work part-time or quit work. One may forgo continuing education, retirement accumulation, professional networking, etc. Earning momentum is slowed or lost, and this can never be regained, nor even calculated.
How do you make the partner whole after years or decades of sacrificed earning momentum?
to # 21 dougjnn,
re: prenups
I can understand the role of a prenup to address pre-existing financial dependents or business partners.
I can understand the role of a prenup to address enormous differences in assets.
It is counterintuitive, but giving of oneself can bond a marriage. Example: during the second year of our marriage, my husband made a decision that would have hugely benefited my career over his. I was astounded at his generosity and faith in me. (that move never played out, but I know his intent was sincere). I felt so indebted to him. Now, advance the calendar 15 years. Our marriage was going poorly, and I contemplated divorce, but I couldn’t shake the memory of his faith and trust in our union.
I view a prenup as the first step towards divorce.
anony –
Obviously you’re trying emotional blackmail to try to keep extracting unjust rent (int he economists sense) from men in this equal career opportunity age. (Equal or with some advantages for educated women actually, AA and PC being what they are today.)
My basic answer to your statement is that men should not marry women who have and retain attitudes such as yours.
Marriage in America benefits only women and potentially (upon divorce) massively screws over men.
What to women actually enforcably promise men in marriage? What does our culture even very strongly morally urge women to do for their husbands in marriage? Given them sex more frequently than the wife in certain periods or after the passage of time might want? I think not. The experience of men is, by and large massively not. Fidelity? Young women now admit to adultery in fifty percent of marriages despite a much lower (but not non existent after awhile) female urge to do so, the sense of female entitlement to follow her feelings in all things is so great in our culture, as sold to us by our media. Further there is great reason to think, supported by what social research there is on the topic, that women understate their number of sexual partners in anonymous questionaires, and presumably would be even more likely for similar reasons to understate their infidelity.
All the while, if she does decide to pull the plug and he doesn’t have a strong prenup, he pays through the nose.
Big time divorce theft is always a threat, including because of HER adultery, or her successfully hidden adultery leading to the desire to leave the marriage and go searching out in the open once she does. So if he cheats, he’s punished by divorce theft. If she cheats, he’s punished by divorce theft.
Yet we’re told that a prenup is “the first step towards divorce”.
Honey please. It’s the first step towards avoiding marriage with some women.
bump.
bump