From my view. Woman have the most power before having sex, guys have the power after.

I guess the question would be if woman really are saying no how do you combat that?

I just never had em say no when I grab that ass and start fucking (except 6 months before 1st wife left). I guess I am
a special snowflake yay”

Of course you’re a special snowflake, once we subtract the hardwired to a particular mindset that drives men to seek a regular source of new (and younger) pussy of course. Your wife seems to be a lucky woman though. Maybe we can talk about recipes and the benefits of having our own money, plus the trust from husbands not to fuck everything up beyond repair that’s been earned not just automatic.

It’s understandable why marriage seems like a hell of one’s own making when the person has made a poor choice in whom they decided to marry. I just don’t think that it’s so impossible in the present time to find one person who is the better option and then stick with them for the long haul, and get married. Anyone should know that pressure to do something or else, whether it’s to get married or to stop leaving the toilet seat up, is a sign that they should keep looking because they can do better. Barring anything illegal or likely to cause serious bodily injury or permanently deprive them of the use of part of their body.

Roosh referred to a couple of studies a couple of post’s ago; find them linked at this page:

http://www.rooshv.com/single-women-who-purposefully-have-children-are-commiting-crimes-against-humanity

On top of this, women generally are horrible with money. They save and invest much, much less than man. They don’t plan for the future. They struggle with high-interest debt. The vast majority of subprime borrowers were women. Women are the primary targets of advertising and marketing. TV is produced entirely with an eye to tickling more consumer dollars out of women. Women “make the majority of household buying decisions.” (This is often touted as if that gives them power or makes them important–it doesn’t. It just means they blow more money on meaningless bullshit.)

In short, women in the workplace has contributed nothing positive since their entry decades ago. Real wages have declined or stagnated, and their hard-won dollars have mostly gone to far for stupid crap rather than drive investment and further innovation. Women working is like a hamster on a wheel…they work to buy themselves things and placate their materialistic desires, and for basic-level sustaining expenses like food and rent.

David:”Women aren’t needed in the workforce. Nations can do perfectly well without women working outside the home. The West made excellent progress before women entered the workforce in large numbers a few decades ago. Japan and the other Asian economies have done well with women at home.

Women are not very creative, especially technically. They are not needed for economic progress. A mediocre female replacing a mediocre male in the workplace achieves nothing beside upsetting the mediocre male and his wife.

A few, exceptional women should pursue careers in truly useful areas (medicine for example). But women are mostly second-rate intellectually and make second-rate workers.

I forget the name of the top French Chef who was asked about women chefs. He said that women were better at things like wearing stockings. True.

The real reason academic feminists are so bloody unhappy is that they know enough history to realise that women have achieved practically nothing intellectually. This makes them furious, looking for scapegoats, and determined not to adopt traditional female roles.”

David – you make some excellent points in your above comment, and thus I reprinted it in full because it deserved a repeat.

It is increasingly difficult for a man to be or remain dominant in relation to his wife or females in general when women are now employed in numbers comparable to men and they are increasingly the primary breadwinners for many families. – http://www.the-spearhead.com/2009/11/09/mancession-deepens-male-unemployment-hits-record-postwar-high/

The fact is that the economy of America and the entire West is becoming ‘betaized’ and feminized; with the leveling off of population growth in The West, there is less construction and engineering to do overall (traditionally men’s careers). Also, with the outsourcing of many factory or craftsman jobs, there are fewer decent jobs for blue-collar/working-class males. I’ve seen many blue-collar males have their lives and pride destroyed by outsourcing; whereas before they were building and making things of true value and pulling in a decent wage which supported a family, now they are becoming serfs at low-wage McJobs while their wives are making more than them ‘working’ in some government office or ‘teaching’ idiot NAMs who are breeding like rabbits to replace us in some dumpy (government) school.

All this leaves is crappy service (more like ’serfice’) jobs in offices, education, and medicine — almost all of those fields are now increasingly dominated by females and all are government supported or at least subsidized. Many men turn to law or banking, but again those are often not very creative or truly constructive occupations because they so often involve ripping people off and spreading misery in society.

The whole Western economy is becoming biased against Western men — White Western men spent the last few centuries laboring in order to build up the economy so that everyone could enjoy a decent standard of living in advanced nations, doing all of the heavy and truly hard work like building roads, logging, farming/ranching, engineering, science, manufacturing, mining, etc — and now that everything has been built very many males are being tossed aside in favor of cheaper foreign or female labor. If women are the “second sex,” men have become the “disposable sex.”

All of this looks to me like a deliberate (even conspiratorial) attempt by a rootless cosmopolitan bankster/plutocratic class to undermine the entire economic foundation of The West and replace it with bottom-of-the-barrel femincentric and anti-White ’serfice’ globalism.

Its tough to find a “hot” chick that is also “worldly” and her thought processes extend beyond gucci, versace, or catching the latest re-run of “Sex & the City”.

You have no one to blame but yourself if you decide it’s a-okay to chain yourself to a status-obsessed, consumerist slore.

Remember un-married girls are naughty little bitches, and they want to be spanked, fucked, and then hae you blow you mustard all over their ass cheeks………….mostly when the know they “shouldn’t” be doing this “naughty” stuff due to some moralistic code taught by parents, school or religion.

Reading the marrried guys posts here, maintaining the “Gina-Tingle after marriage must be as rare as black pearls.